|
SHALIGRAM SHUKLA 
AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF THE HARE KRISHNA
MOVEMENT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
CRIMINAL TERM, COUNTY OF QUEENS
Index No. 2012/76
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
against
ANGUS MURPHY and ISKCON, INC,
Defendants.
Index No. 2114/76
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
against
HAROLD CONLEY a/k/a TRAI DAS, and ISKCON, INC,
Defendants.
AFFIDAVIT
SHALIGRAM SHUKLA, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. I am a professor of linguistics, anthropology
and Sanskrit at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. I graduated
with a B.A. from Cambridge in 1962, received an M.A. in Tibetan
Linguistics from Cornell in 1965, and a Ph.D. from Cornell in 1967.
I have taught at Georgetown University since 1968.
2. I was born in India to a traditional Brahmin family. I learned
Sanskrit at the age of ten and have studied the Hindu scriptures
throughout my life. I am myself a worshipper of Krishna as a way
of life.
3. As a member of the Indian community,
and one who has devoutly observed the principles of the Hindu faith,
the missionary activities of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta
Swami Praphupada are most dear to me. We people of India are eternally
grateful to this Hare Krishna Movement. We frequent the Hare Krishna
temples regularly just as a Christian would visit the church of
his faith. For us it is more than a church, it is an oasis. The
religious practices for the worship of God offered at the temples
exactly parallel the worship we were taught as youths in India.
To question the life-giving value of these beliefs and practices,
to call the Hare Krishna movement a cult, is to insult the most
precious tradition of our ancient Indian culture.
4. There are eighteen chapters in the Bhagavad-Gita,
eighteen thousand verses in the Srimad Bhagavatam, and several hundred
verses in the Upanishads. These are the literary works which form
the foundation of Indian culture and religion. They are all in Sanskrit.
His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, founder of
the Hare Krishna Movement, has transcribed these texts, has translated
them, and has explained their essence in English -- from Sanskrit
into English. One is an ancient classical language, and the other
a foreign language, a difficult task indeed.
5. I have studied most of Swami Prabhupada's
works, and can testify as a Sanskrit scholar that they are excellent;
they have excellence of thought, perception and understanding. Not
only myself, but hundreds of my colleagues throughout the United
States and abroad, such as Dr. Samuel Atkins of Princeton University
and Dr. William A. Johnson of Brandeis University, are taking-great
interest in these ancient Vedic classics, as rendered by Swami Prabhupada,
and are studying them and teaching them in their classrooms. This
in itself should be more than enough proof of their credibility
and authenticity.
6. Such a man with such vision, scholarship,
devotion, and hard work, could never associate himself with a cult
or with anything that feeds on human greed, weakness, and thrives
on exploitation of human values. Only a person with wrong or mutilated
information and ill-intentions will doubt the integrity of this
man and question the most noble and pious ideals practiced by the
Hare Krishna Movement, a movement which he so naturally founded.
7. It is inconceivable to me that efforts
on behalf of propagation of Krishna Consciousness can be maligned
by calling them brainwashing, and criminalized by indictment in
a country which prides itself upon freedom of religion, expression
and association, while at the same time the efforts of missionaries
of the more popular American religions are applauded, encouraged,
and even sanctioned by tax exemptions and other official approval.
8. No member of the Hare Krishna Movement
could, consistent with the principles of Krishna Consciousness and
adherence to the practices of the Hare Krishna Movement, engage
in any kind of coercive activity. If any persons have testified
or otherwise given evidence that such was the case, it can only
reflect the bias and opinion of such persons and not fact. I believe
devoutly that an examination of the testimony which may have been
given to the Grand Jury in support of the indictments outstanding
against Angus Murphy, Harold Conley and the International Society
for Krishna Consciousness can only reveal that there is no evidence
to support charges of criminal activity, but only misapprehensions,
prejudicial opinions, and perverted judgments.
WHEREFORE, I join in the request on behalf
of the defendants that the minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings
be made available for examination by persons expert and familiar
with the practices of Krishna Consciousness so that the meaning
in context of what may be therein contained can be elucidated for
the Court.
SHALIGRAM SHUKLA
Sworn to before me, this day of December,
1976.
|